Structural changes in US agriculture toward a more corporate-oriented and v
ertically aligned system have focused attention on the relative efficacy of
the anti-corporate farming laws of nine Midwestern states. Using state-lev
el data from a survey of agricultural lawyers and the U.S. Census of Agricu
lture, we find that the restrictiveness of the laws vary among states, and
the relative restrictiveness of the laws have changed over time. Also, stre
ngthening a law tends to limit acreage under non-family corporate ownership
arrangements. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.