Achievement goal theorists propose that both situational factors and indivi
dual differences influence which type of achievement goals individuals adop
t. That is, instructions can be used to make a situation task-involving or
ego-involving, but individuals also have dispositional tendencies to approa
ch achievement tasks with task and/or ego orientations. In this experiment
we investigated the independent and interactive effects of situational and
dispositional achievement goals on performance. College students performed
a brainstorming task after receiving neutral, task-involving, or ego-involv
ing instructions. General task and ego orientations toward achievement task
s were assessed before the students tried the task, and perceived ability w
as assessed after a practice trial. Consistent with the predictions of achi
evement goal theorists, perceived ability was more strongly related to perf
ormance when students were given ego-involving rather than task-involving i
nstructions. In addition, task orientation was more strongly related to per
formance when task-involving rather than ego-involving instructions were gi
ven. The results demonstrate that dispositional and situational factors may
interact to predict performance.