This paper addresses the selection of controlled variables, that is, "what
should we control". The concept of self-optimizing control provides a syste
matic tool for this, and we show how it can be applied to the Tennessee Eas
tman process, which has a very large number of candidate variables. In this
paper, we present a systematic procedure for reducing the number of altern
atives. One step is to eliminate variables that, if they had constant setpo
ints, would result in large losses or infeasibility when there were disturb
ances (with the remaining degrees of freedom reoptimized). The following co
ntrolled variables are recommended for this process: optimally constrained
variables, including reactor level (minimum), reactor pressure (maximum), c
ompressor recycle valve (closed), stripper steam valve (closed), and agitat
or speed (maximum); and unconstrained variables with good self-optimizing p
roperties, including reactor temperature, composition of C in purge, and re
cycle flow or compressor work. The feasibility of this choice is confirmed
by simulations. A common suggestion is to control the composition of inerts
. However, this seems to be a poor choice for this process because disturba
nces or implementation error can cause infeasibility.