OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of three purified protein derivative
(PPD) formulations: Tubersol (Connaught); RT23, Statens Serum Institut (SSI
); and R123, Mexico, tested in Mexican populations at low and high risk for
tuberculosis (M).
DESIGN: A double-blinded clinical trial.
SETTING: A university hospital in Mexico City.
PARTICIPANTS: The low-risk population was first or second-year medical stud
ents with no patient contact; the high-risk population was healthcare worke
rs at a university hospital.
METHODS: Each of the study subjects received the three different PPD, prepa
rations. Risk factors for TB, including age, gender, occupation, bacille Ca
lmette-Guerin (BCG) status, and TB exposure, were recorded. A 0.1-mL aliquo
t of each preparation was injected in the left and right forearms of volunt
eers using the Mantoux technique. Blind readings were done 48 to 72 hours l
ater. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated at 10 mm of induration us
ing Tubersol as the reference standard. The SSI tested the potency of the d
ifferent PPD, preparations in previously sensitized guinea pigs.
RESULTS: The low-risk population had a prevalence of positive PPD of 26%. I
n the low-risk population, RT23 prepared in Mexico, compared to the 5 TU of
Tubersol, had a sensitivity of 51%, a specificity of 100%, a positive pred
ictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 86%. The RT23 prepa
red at the SSI had a sensitivity of 69%, a specificity of 99%, a positive p
redictive value of 95%, and a negative predictive value of 90%. In the high
-risk population, the prevalence of positive PPD was 57%. The RT23 prepared
in Mexico had a sensitivity of 33%, a specificity of 100%, and a positive
predictive value of 53%; the RT23 prepared at the SSI had a sensitivity of
91%, a specificity of 98%, a positive predictive value of 98%, and a negati
ve predictive value of 89%. RT23 used in Mexico had a potency of only 23% o
f that of the control. There was no statistical association among those wit
h a positive PPD, irrespective of previous BCG vaccination (relative risk,
0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-1.3; P=.78).
CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare workers had twice the prevalence of positive PPD co
mpared to medical students. RT23 prepared in Mexico had a low sensitivity i
n both populations compared to 5 TU of Tubersol and RT23 prepared at the SS
I. Previous BCG vaccination did not correlate with a positive PPD. Low pote
ncy of the RT23 preparation in Mexico was confirmed in guinea pigs. Best in
tentions in a TB program are not enough if they are not followed by high-qu
ality control (Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001;22:481-484).