This short paper outlines my position on a future direction for computation
al research on visual motion understanding. The direction combines motion p
erception, visual attention, action representation and computational vision
. Due the breadth of literature in these areas, the paper cannot present a
comprehensive review of any one topic. The review is a selective one, a sel
ection that attempts to make some particular points. I claim that task-dire
cted attentive processing is a largely unexplored dimension in the computat
ional motion field. I recount in the context of motion understanding a past
argument that in order to make vision systems general, attention is one of
the components of the strategy. No matter how sophisticated the methods be
come for extracting motion information from image sequences, it will not be
possible to achieve the goal of human-like performance without integrating
the optimization of processing that attention provides. Virtually all past
surveys of computational models of motion processing completely ignore att
ention. However, the concept has crept into work over the years in a variet
y of ways. A second claim is that the biology of attention offers some inte
resting insights to guide future development. Many computational authors ha
d previously commented that too little is known about how biological vision
systems use task-directed attention in motion processing; this is no longe
r true. Here, I briefly summarize biological evidence that attentive proces
sing affects all aspects of visual perception including motion, and again e
mphasize that this paper does not do justice to the breadth and depth of th
e field. New findings provide a critical link between the perception of vis
ual actions and their execution. Together these findings point to a strateg
y for motion understanding closely related to that presented more than two
decades ago.