It has long been claimed that social welfare programmes harm economic devel
opment. These programmes, it is alleged, depress work incentives, divert sc
arce investment resources to 'unproductive' social services and create a la
rge underclass of dependent individuals. Welfare reform in the United State
s intends to reverse these allegedly negative economic effects by requiring
welfare clients to work. It also hopes to reduce poverty. This article exa
mines these claims. It discusses the welfare reform programme and concludes
that its impact on both economic development and poverty has been minimal.
Policies that transcend the current obsession with work, promote sustained
economic development and invest in human capabilities are more likely to s
ucceed.