Ma. Maluf et al., Conventional and conventional plus modified ultrafiltration during cardiacsurgery in high-risk congenital heart disease, J CARD SURG, 42(4), 2001, pp. 465-473
Background. This prospective nonrandomized study is the critical assessment
of conventional ultrafiltration (CUF) and modified ultrafiltration (MUF) t
echniques and their efficiency in congenital heart disease surgeries. Use o
f cardiopulmonary bypass (C PB) in children is associated with body water r
etention as a consequence of prime volume and systemic inflammatory reactio
n. The CUF during CPB has reduced body water excess and the MUF after CPB,
removes inflammatory mediators, improves hemodynamic performance, and decre
ases transfusion requirements.
Methods. Forty-one patients, aged 9 to 36 months, submitted to surgical cor
rection for cardiac defects, Using CPB, were divided into 2 similar groups:
CUF (21 patients) operated between 1996-1997 were ultrafiltered during CPB
, and CUF+MUF, (20 patients) operated between 1997-1998 and ultrafiltered d
uring and after CPB. Postoperative duration of ventilator support, pediatri
c intensive care unit stay (PICU), hospital stay of the groups with and wit
hout preoperative pulmonary hypertension (PH), as well as transfusion requi
rement, hematocrit and platelet counts were compared.
Results. There were no technical complications and a significant ultrafiltr
ate in the CUF+MUF group was observed as compared to the CUF group. No sign
ificant differences were observed between the CUF and CUF+MUF groups regard
ing ventilatory support, PICU stay and hospital stay. Requirements for red
cell transfusion, Ht and platelet counts were not statistically different.
Conclusions. CUF and CUF+MUF were safe and efficient methods for patient st
abilization independent of diagnosis and complexity of surgery. Future clin
ical evaluation should address a larger population of patients to research
the different variables.