Molecular dynamics simulations of solvent reorganization in electron-transfer reactions

Citation
C. Hartnig et Mtm. Koper, Molecular dynamics simulations of solvent reorganization in electron-transfer reactions, J CHEM PHYS, 115(18), 2001, pp. 8540-8546
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Physical Chemistry/Chemical Physics
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
ISSN journal
00219606 → ACNP
Volume
115
Issue
18
Year of publication
2001
Pages
8540 - 8546
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-9606(200111)115:18<8540:MDSOSR>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
We present molecular dynamics simulations of solvent reorganization in elec tron-transfer reactions in water. Studying a series of solutes with the sam e core radius (typical for chlorine) but with varying charge from -3 to +3, the simulations show that the single-solute solvent reorganization energy depends quite strongly on the solute's charge, in contrast with the continu um Marcus theory. Due to the ion-dipole interactions, electrostriction play s an important role for charged species. The effective radius of a neutral species is comparatively larger, making the solvent reorganization energy s mall. Strong increases in the solvent reorganization energy occur when the solute is charged to either -1 to +1, due to the significantly smaller effe ctive radius caused by the ion-dipole interactions. However, the effect is nonsymmetric because the center of the water dipole can approach closer to the negative species than to the positive species. Hence, the nonlinearity occurs mainly in the transition from 0 to -1. For higher charges (+3, +2, - 2, -3), dielectric saturation causes a decrease in the reorganization energ y with increasing charge. We also calculate the equilibrium activation ener gy for an outer-sphere electrochemical electron-transfer reaction of the Xe(-)reversible arrowX(-) type, with varying of the core radius of the X spe cies. The deviations from Marcus theory are relatively small for large reac tants, but get more significant for small reactants. This is mainly due to the fact that the changes in electrostriction have a comparatively large ef fect for small solutes. (C) 2001 American Institute of Physics.