The use of PVP-iodine as an adjunct to non-surgical treatment of chronic periodontitis

Citation
B. Rosling et al., The use of PVP-iodine as an adjunct to non-surgical treatment of chronic periodontitis, J CLIN PER, 28(11), 2001, pp. 1023-1031
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry/Oral Surgery & Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
ISSN journal
03036979 → ACNP
Volume
28
Issue
11
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1023 - 1031
Database
ISI
SICI code
0303-6979(200111)28:11<1023:TUOPAA>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
Objective: The present study was performed to assess the effect of topicall y-applied PVP-iodine, used as an adjunct both during basic non-surgical the rapy and at re-treatment during the long-term maintenance of patients with advanced periodontal disease. Material and Methods: 223 patients with advanced destructive periodontitis were recruited. The participants met the following inclusion criteria: (i) a minimum of 8 non-molar teeth, (ii) probing pocket depth of greater than o r equal to6 mm at greater than or equal to2 teeth in each dentate quadrant, and radiographic bone loss exceeding 40% at the same teeth, A baseline I e xamination included assessment of plaque, gingivitis, probing pocket depth (PPD), probing attachment level (PAL) and radiographic bone height (RXBL). Following baseline I, the patients were stratified into 2 treatment groups; 2 subjects out of 3 were included in a control group and I in a test group . All participants, on an individual basis, received a case presentation an d were instructed in proper self-performed plaque control measures. Non-sur gical therapy was performed by the use of an ultrasonic device. The instrum entation in the test group was combined with the administration of 0.1% PVP -iodine. All subjects were recalled for comprehensive examinations 3, 6 and 12 months (baseline 11) after baseline I and then after 3, 5 and 13 years of maintenance therapy. PAL determinations were performed annually. Subject s (losers) who at the re-examinations after 1, 2 and 3 years of maintenance demonstrated an annual further loss of PAL greater than or equal to2 mm at greater than or equal to4 teeth were exited from the study and referred fo r retreatment. There were 9 losers in the test and 31 in the control group. In addition, 8 subjects in the test and 25 subjects in the control group w ithdrew from the trial for reasons unrelated to the study. These 73 subject s were not included in the data presentation from the various examinations. Results: It was demonstrated that non-surgical periodontal therapy resulted in (i) improved gingival conditions, (ii) reduced PPD, (iii) gain in PAL. It was also documented that the topical application of 0.1% PVP-iodine in c onjunction with the mechanical root debridement established conditions whic h further improved the outcome of therapy. This was evidenced by the fact t hat at the 3, 6, and 12 months re-examinations after baseline 1, the test g roup had significantly lower mean PPD values and significantly more gain of PAL than the control group. During the 12 years of SPT, it was possible fo r most subjects in both groups to maintain shallow pockets and to avoid mar ked further loss of PAL. There were, however, a larger number of losers in the control than in the test group. Conclusion: PVP-iodine, topically applied during subgingival instrumentatio n, may improve the outcome of non-surgical periodontal therapy.