This paper reports on a qualitative study of how health care providers
in the states of Washington and Oregon define and implement medical n
ecessity. Based on a series of semi-structured interviews, we found th
at few insurers or health care plans in our sample attempted to resolv
e the ambiguities inherent in defining medical necessity. More importa
ntly, our results suggest that physicians in managed care plans were n
ot using general definitions of medical necessity to make clinical dec
isions, but instead relied on utilization management techniques to gui
de the use of medical resources. We conclude that medical necessity as
an organizing principle for clinical practice decision making is like
ly to continue to erode in a managed care environment.