Background. The authors conducted a study to evaluate the fluoride released
from two fluoride varnishes: Duraphat (Colgate-Palmolive Co., New York) an
d Duraflor (Pharmascience Inc., Montreal). Fluoride-release information for
these commercially available dental products has not been available to cli
nicians treating children at risk of developing dental caries.
Methods. The authors painted enamel slabs from primary molar teeth with 30
milligrams of two varnishes: nine samples received Duraphat, nine received
Duraflor and five samples served as controls. The samples were immersed in
buffered calcium phosphate solution (pH, 6.0) to simulate the oral environm
ent, and the amount of fluoride released was measured weekly for six months
.
Results. From week 4 to the end of the study, Duraphat released significant
ly more fluoride than Duraflor. Duraflor continued releasing fluoride until
week 19, while Duraphat released fluoride until week 28. The authors found
greater variability in the release of fluoride from the Duraflor samples t
han from the Duraphat samples. Two-thirds of the fluoride was released from
both products by the end of study.
Conclusions. Both varnishes released fluoride for five to six months. Howev
er, the two products exhibited differences in their release kinetics.
Clinical Implications. These findings show that either of the fluoride varn
ishes may maintain a high level of fluoride in plaque fluid around primary
teeth over a long period, but that the availability of fluoride may vary am
ong tubes of the same product and between the two products themselves.