Seal responses to airgun sounds during summer seismic surveys in the Alaskan Beaufort Sea

Citation
Re. Harris et al., Seal responses to airgun sounds during summer seismic surveys in the Alaskan Beaufort Sea, MAR MAMM SC, 17(4), 2001, pp. 795-812
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences
Journal title
MARINE MAMMAL SCIENCE
ISSN journal
08240469 → ACNP
Volume
17
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
795 - 812
Database
ISI
SICI code
0824-0469(200110)17:4<795:SRTASD>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Numbers, sighting distances, and behavior of seals were studied during a ne arshore seismic program off northern Alaska in July-September 1996. We obse rved from the seismic vessel for 885.6 h, including all periods (day and ni ght) when airguns operated and many periods without airguns. Of 422 seals s een, 421 were seen in daylight; 91.8% were ringed seals, 7.3% were bearded seals, and 0.9% were spotted seals. About 79% were first seen within 250 m of the seismic boat, and sighting rate declined rapidly at lateral distance s > 50 m. During daylight, seals were seen at nearly identical rates (0.60- 0.63/h) during periods with no airguns firing, one airgun, and a "full-arra y" of 8-11 120-in(3) airguns. However, seals tended to be farther away (P < 0.0001) during full-array seismic. There was partial avoidance of the zone < 150 rn from the boat during full-array seismic, but seals apparently did not move much beyond 250 m. "Swimming away" was more common during full-ar ray than no-airgun periods, but relative frequencies of five behaviors did not differ significantly among distance categories. Airgun operations were interrupted 112 times when seals were sighted within safety radii (150-250 m). The National Marine Fisheries Service specified these radii in the Inci dental Harassment Authorization issued for the project; they are based on a 190 dB re I mu Pa (rms) criterion for broadband received level. Methods fo r estimating numbers of seals potentially affected by the seismic program a re described, and effectiveness of monitoring and mitigation is discussed. There is an urgent need for more data on effects of strong seismic pulses o n seals.