Periodic bimanual movements are often the focus of studies of the basic org
anizational principles of human actions(1-25). In such movements there is a
typical spontaneous tendency towards mirror symmetry. Even involuntary sli
ps from asymmetrical movement patterns into symmetry occur, but not vice ve
rsa. Traditionally, this phenomenon has been interpreted as a tendency towa
rds co-activation of homologous muscles, probably originating in motoric ne
uronal structures. Here we provide evidence contrary to this widespread ass
umption. We show for two prominent experimental models-bimanual finger osci
llation(1) and bimanual four-finger tapping(2)-that the symmetry bias is ac
tually towards spatial, perceptual symmetry, without regard to the muscles
involved. We suggest that spontaneous coordination phenomena of this kind a
re purely perceptual in nature. In the case of a bimanual circling model, o
ur findings reveal that highly complex, even 'impossible' movements can eas
ily be performed with only simple visual feedback. A 'motoric' representati
on of the performed perceptual oscillation patterns is not necessary. Thus
there is no need to translate such a 'motoric' into a 'perceptual' represen
tation or vice versa, using 'internal models' (ref. 29). We suggest that vo
luntary movements are organized by way of a representation of the perceptua
l goals, whereas the corresponding motor activity, of sometimes high comple
xity, is spontaneously and flexibly tuned in.