Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging to determine the extent of resection of pituitary macroadenomas during transsphenoidal microsurgery

Citation
Rj. Bohinski et al., Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging to determine the extent of resection of pituitary macroadenomas during transsphenoidal microsurgery, NEUROSURGER, 49(5), 2001, pp. 1133-1143
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology,"Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
NEUROSURGERY
ISSN journal
0148396X → ACNP
Volume
49
Issue
5
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1133 - 1143
Database
ISI
SICI code
0148-396X(200111)49:5<1133:IMRITD>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Well-established surgical goals for pituitary macroadenomas incl ude gross total resection for noninvasive tumors and debulking with optic c hiasm decompression for invasive tumors. In this report, we examine the saf ety, reliability, and outcome of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) used to assess the extent of resection, and thus the achievement of preoperative surgical goals, during transsphenoidal microneurosurgery. METHODS: Our magnetic resonance operating room contains a Hitachi AIRIS II 0.3-T, vertical-field open magnet (Hitachi Medical Systems America, Inc., T winsburg, OH). A motorized scanner tabletop moves the patient between the i maging and operative positions. For transsphenoidal surgery, the patient is positioned directly on the scanner tabletop so that the surgical field is located between 1.2 and 1.6 m from the magnet isocenter. At this location, the magnetic field strength is low (< 20 G), thus permitting the use of man y conventional surgical instruments. Thirty consecutive patients with pitui tary macroadenomas underwent tumor resection in our magnetic resonance oper ating room by use of a standard transsphenoidal approach. After initial res ection, the patient was advanced into the scanner for imaging. If residual tumor was demonstrated and deemed surgically accessible, the patient underw ent immediate re-exploration. RESULTS: iMRI was performed successfully in all 30 patients. In one patient , iMRI was used to clarify the significance of hemorrhage from the sellar r egion and resulted in immediate conversion of the procedure to a craniotomy . In the remaining 29 patients, initial iMRI demonstrated that the endpoint for extent of resection had been achieved in only 10 patients (34%) after an initial resection attempt, whereas 19 patients (66%) still had unaccepta ble residual tumor. All 19 of these latter patients underwent re-exploratio n. Ultimately, re-exploration resulted in the achievement of the planned en dpoint for extent of resection in all of the 29 completed transsphenoidal e xplorations. Operative time was extended in all cases by at least 20 minute s. CONCLUSION: iMRI can be used to safely, reliably, and objectively assess th e extent of resection of pituitary macroadenomas during the transsphenoidal approach. The surgeon is frequently surprised by the extent of residual tu mor after an initial resection attempt and finds the intraoperative images useful for guiding further resection.