Long-term changes in Serengeti-Mara wildebeest and land cover: Pastoralism, population, or policies?

Citation
K. Homewood et al., Long-term changes in Serengeti-Mara wildebeest and land cover: Pastoralism, population, or policies?, P NAS US, 98(22), 2001, pp. 12544-12549
Citations number
44
Categorie Soggetti
Multidisciplinary
Journal title
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ISSN journal
00278424 → ACNP
Volume
98
Issue
22
Year of publication
2001
Pages
12544 - 12549
Database
ISI
SICI code
0027-8424(20011023)98:22<12544:LCISWA>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
Declines in habitat and wildlife in semiarid African savannas are widely re ported and commonly attributed to agropastoral population growth, livestock impacts, and subsistence cultivation. However, extreme annual and shorter- term variability of rainfall, primary production, vegetation, and populatio ns of grazers make directional trends and causal chains hard to establish i n these ecosystems. Here two decades of changes in land cover and wildebees t in the Serengeti-Mara region of East Africa are analyzed in terms of pote ntial drivers (rainfall, human and livestock population growth, socio-econo mic trends, land tenure, agricultural policies, and markets). The natural e xperiment research design controls for confounding variables, and our conce ptual model and statistical approach integrate natural and social sciences data. The Kenyan part of the ecosystem shows rapid land-cover change and dr astic decline for a wide range of wildlife species, but these changes are a bsent on the Tanzanian side. Temporal climate trends, human population dens ity and growth rates, uptake of small-holder agriculture, and livestock pop ulation trends do not differ between the Kenyan and Tanzanian parts of the ecosystem and cannot account for observed changes. Differences in private v ersus state/communal land tenure, agricultural policy, and market condition s suggest, and spatial correlations confirm, that the major changes in land cover and dominant grazer species numbers are driven primarily by private landowners responding to market opportunities for mechanized agriculture, l ess by agropastoral population growth, cattle numbers, or small-holder land use.