Defending the Articles of Conferation: A response to Sobel

Authors
Citation
Kl. Dougherty, Defending the Articles of Conferation: A response to Sobel, PUBL CHOICE, 109(1-2), 2001, pp. 141-148
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Politucal Science & public Administration
Journal title
PUBLIC CHOICE
ISSN journal
00485829 → ACNP
Volume
109
Issue
1-2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
141 - 148
Database
ISI
SICI code
0048-5829(2001)109:1-2<141:DTAOCA>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
A fundamental mystery of the Articles of Confederation is why the states co ntributed sizeable resources to the confederation government when they were allegedly caught in a collective action problem. In a recent article, Russ el Sobel denies the collective action problem and suggests that our researc h on the incentive structure of the confederation contradicts the evidence. This note clarifies both of our arguments, introduces the type of evidence that would determine whether national public goods were sub-optimally supp lied, and explains why states contributed in a manner that is consistent wi th the evidence and with a deficient institutional design.