Indications and results of liver resection and hepatic chemoembolization for metastatic gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors

Citation
Ka. Yao et al., Indications and results of liver resection and hepatic chemoembolization for metastatic gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors, SURGERY, 130(4), 2001, pp. 677-682
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
SURGERY
ISSN journal
00396060 → ACNP
Volume
130
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
677 - 682
Database
ISI
SICI code
0039-6060(200110)130:4<677:IAROLR>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Background. We reviewed 36 patients with liver metastases from islet cell t umors of the pancreas (n = 18) and carcinoid tumors (n = 18) who were treat ed with surgical resection (n = 16) or hepatic chemoembolization (n = 20). Methods. All resections were complete and included 4 lobectomies, 6 segment al resections, and 6 wedge resections. There were no operative deaths. Results. Median survival has not yet been reached, and the actuarial 5-year survival rate is 70%. Prognostic variables associated with improved diseas e-free survival included prior resection of the primary tit mor and 4 or fe wer metastases resected, (P < .05). With an average of 3 chemoembolization procedures per patient, 17 of 20 patients (90%) demonstrated either a signi ficant radiographic response (n = 5), stabilization of tumor mass (n = 2), or improvement of clinical symptoms (n = 10). Factors related to a sustaine d response (more then 1 year) included surgical resection of the primary tu mor, 4 or more chemoembolization procedures, and liver metastases of 5 cm o r smaller. Median survival after treatment was 32 months (range, 7-63 month s), and the actuarial 5-year survival rate was 40%. Conclusions. Surgical resection of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors provide s the best chance for extended survival. Chemoembolization effectively impr oves clinical symptoms and, in selected patients, may provide sustained tum or control.