The International Monetary Fund has been in the spotlight over recent years
, particularly in the context of its involvement in the East Asian economie
s following the 1997-98 crisis. Various reports on aspects of the internati
onal financial system have made recommendations for reforming the IMF. Havi
ng provided a brief historical and empirical background, this paper identif
ies the underlying issues in the ongoing debate: does the world still need
the IMF, should the Fund be an adjustment or lending institution, what shou
ld be its relationship with private capital markets, should it be a crisis
averter, crisis lender or crisis manager, does it have a long term lending
role in developing countries and is there too much overlap with the World B
ank, do Fund programmes work and what is the future for conditionality, sho
uld the Fund's organisational structure be reformed, and how should the Fun
d be financed? The paper distinguishes between areas of consensus and disse
nt and briefly assesses the chances of reform.