Barium trapping in rectoceles: are we trapped by the wrong definition?

Citation
T. Greenberg et al., Barium trapping in rectoceles: are we trapped by the wrong definition?, ABDOM IMAG, 26(6), 2001, pp. 587-590
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging
Journal title
ABDOMINAL IMAGING
ISSN journal
09428925 → ACNP
Volume
26
Issue
6
Year of publication
2001
Pages
587 - 590
Database
ISI
SICI code
0942-8925(200111/12)26:6<587:BTIRAW>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
Background: Barium trapping within a rectocele is a criterion used by surge ons to select which patients with rectoceles should undergo operative repai r. This proctographic study compared the presence and depth of barium trapp ing within a rectocele on postevacuation radiography with those seen on pos ttoilet radiography after further evacuation in the privacy of the bathroom . Methods: Eighty-two consecutive patients with evidence of barium trapping o n postevacuation radiographs of a fluoroscopic dynamic cystoproctographic e xamination were reviewed retrospectively. The size of the rectoceles and th e depth of barium trapping on the postevacuation and subsequent posttoilet radiographs were measured. Results: The posttoilet radiographs showed resolution of the barium trappin g in 47 (57%) of the 82 patients. Resolution of the trapping was directly r elated to rectocele size. The mean differences in the depth of barium trapp ing between the postevacuation and posttoilet radiographs were significant for all sizes of rectocele. Conclusion: Barium trapping in rectoceles changes with the degree of rectal evacuation. More complete evacuation was shown on the posttoilet radiograp h than on the postevacuation radiograph. Consequently, the posttoilet radio graph may be more appropriate for the preoperative assessment of barium tra pping within rectoceles.