Boy/girl differences in risk for reading disability: Potential clues?

Citation
Jl. St Sauver et al., Boy/girl differences in risk for reading disability: Potential clues?, AM J EPIDEM, 154(9), 2001, pp. 787-794
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00029262 → ACNP
Volume
154
Issue
9
Year of publication
2001
Pages
787 - 794
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9262(20011101)154:9<787:BDIRFR>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
The authors conducted a case-control study to determine whether risk factor s for reading disability (RD) differentially affect boys and girls. The stu dy population included all children born between 1976 and 1982 in Olmsted C ounty, Minnesota (n = 5,701). A total of 303 RD cases were identified by us ing intelligence quotient and achievement test scores collected from school and medical records. After excluding those who met exclusion criteria (n = 869), controls consisted of all children not identified with RD (n = 4,529 ). The authors examined the association between RD and potential risk facto rs in boys and girls and confirmed their results in multivariable, logistic regression models. Multivariable models indicated that girls of low birth weight were more than twice as likely to be identified as RD (odds ratio (O R) = 2.94, 95% confidence interval (Cl): 1.09, 6.25). Girls whose mothers h ad 12 or fewer years of education were twice as likely to be identified as RD (OR = 2.14, 95% Cl: 1.24, 3.72). However, girls whose fathers were aged 35 years or older at the time of birth were less likely to be identified as RD (OR = 0.24, 95% Cl: 0.06, 0.92). Only 12 or fewer years of paternal edu cation was associated with increased RD in boys (OR = 2.28, 95% Cl: 1.59, 3 .27). Boys and girls appear to be differentially susceptible to RD risk fac tors, suggesting that the biologic processes leading to RD may differ betwe en boys and girls.