How does the World Trade Organization (WTO) relate to the wider corpus of p
ublic international law? What, in turn, is the role of public international
law in WTO dispute settlement? This paper aims at resolving these two diff
icult questions. No straightforward answers to them can be found in WTO rul
es.' Yet answering them has major ramifications both for the WTO (is the WT
O a largely "self-contained regime" or is it not?(2)) and for international
law (is the future of international law further fragmentation or increased
unity?(3)). This exercise will be conducted under the law as it stands tod
ay that is, the law as it may be invoked at present before the WTO "judicia
ry" (panels and the Appellate Body). Of course, WTO members (viz., the WTO
"legislator") could clarify or change the relationship between WTO rules an
d other rules of international law.(4) However, it is unlikely that such ch
anges will occur any time soon. In part I, I examine the general relationsh
ip between public international law and WTO law. I then assess, more specif
ically, the role of public international law in WTO dispute settlement in p
art II and offer some conclusions in part III.