PURPOSE: To report the location of the inferior oblique muscle after enucle
ation without primary attachment of the muscle to the orbital implant and a
fter evisceration.
METHODS: Interventional case series. Retrospectively, eight orbital magneti
c resonance imaging (MRI) studies were analyzed, four after enucleation and
four after evisceration, to assess the position of the inferior oblique mu
scle relative to the orbital implant and the point of insertion.
RESULTS: In the enucleation patients, the inferior oblique muscle was anter
iorly displaced and the muscle appeared to insert into an inferior subconju
nctival scar mass in three of the four patients. In all four of the eviscer
ation patients, the inferior oblique muscle appeared normally positioned an
d inserted onto the implant in the normal location.
CONCLUSION: Enucleation without suturing of the inferior oblique muscle to
the implant is associated with healing in an abnormal anterior location and
into an inferior subconjunctival scar mass. Evisceration does not appear t
o disrupt the normal position or insertion of the inferior oblique muscle.
(C) 2001 by Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.