Introduction. The aim of this study was to compare total intravenous anaest
hesia (TIVA) using propofol and remifentanil (P/R-group) and balanced anaes
thesia (BA) using sevoflurane and remifentanil (S/R-group) for paediatric s
urgery. Patients and methods. A total of 120 patients aged 6 months to 16 y
ears scheduled for elective minor lower abdominal surgery were randomly ass
igned to receive either propofol (5-10 mg/kg/h) and remifentanil (0.125-1.0
mug/kg/min) or sevoflurane (1.0-1.5 MAC) and remifentanil (0.125-1.0 mug/k
g/min). Perioperative haemodynamics as well as recovery and discharge times
, PONV and side-effects were studied. The patients vigilance, comfort and p
ain intensity were assessed postoperatively using the objective pain discom
fort scale, the Steward post-anaesthetic recovery score and a visual analog
ue scale. Results. Postoperative recovery (9.0 vs 11.6 min) and extubation
times (11.8 vs. 15.0 min) as well as the time taken until a Steward post-an
aesthetic recovery score >3/4 (15.2 vs.21.4 min) was reached were significa
ntly shorter in the P/R-group. However, the length of time until discharge
to the ward, postoperative comfort, pain intensity and analgesic requiremen
ts as well as PONV were comparable in both groups. Conclusions. With regard
s to the investigated parameters,TIVA with propofol and remifentanil is equ
ally effective as BA with sevoflurane and remifentanil in paediatric patien
ts. However, considering the selected dosing regimen, recovery times were s
ignificantly shorter for children after TIVA.