Study objective: We sought to validate a previously developed model of emer
gency department patient satisfaction in a general population using a stand
ard mailed format. The study aims to export the findings of a comprehensive
ED quality-of-care study to an easily measured patient population.
Methods: A double-sided, single-page survey was mailed to all patients disc
harged home from 4 teaching hospital EDs during a 1-month period. Determina
nts of patient satisfaction were analyzed with a previously developed multi
variate, ordinal logistic-regression model.
Results: The mail survey response rate was 22.9% (2,373/10,381). The survey
validates the importance of previously identified determinants of patient
satisfaction, including age, help not received when needed, poor explanatio
n of problem, not told about wait time, not told when to resume normal acti
vity, poor explanation of test results, and not told when to return to the
ED (P < .01). Greater age predicted higher patient satisfaction, whereas al
l other variables correlated with lower patient satisfaction. In contrast w
ith prior findings, black race was not a significant predictor of satisfact
ion in the mail survey population. Low ratings of overall care are strongly
correlated with reduced willingness to return (P < .0001).
Conclusion: A patient satisfaction model was previously developed from a co
mprehensive research survey of ED care. We demonstrate the generalizability
of this model to a mail survey population and replicate the finding that s
atisfaction strongly predicts willingness to return. The response rate of t
his study is typical of commercial patient-satisfaction surveys. The valida
ted model suggests that ED patient satisfaction improvement efforts should
focus on a limited number of modifiable and easily measured factors.