Comparative responsiveness of measures of pain and function after total hip replacement

Citation
Ak. Nilsdotter et al., Comparative responsiveness of measures of pain and function after total hip replacement, ARTH RH ART, 45(3), 2001, pp. 258-262
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Rheumatology
Journal title
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH
ISSN journal
00043591 → ACNP
Volume
45
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
258 - 262
Database
ISI
SICI code
0004-3591(200106)45:3<258:CROMOP>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Objective. To compare the responsiveness of the Functional Assessment Syste m (FAS), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form (SF-36) in pati ents with osteoarthritis (OA) scheduled for total hip replacement. Method. Twenty patients with a mean age at surgery of 72.6 years, with prim ary OA of the hip, were investigated preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 mon ths postoperatively with the FAS, WOMAC, and SF-36. The responsiveness was calculated as standardized response mean, effect size, and relative efficie ncy. Results. The pain and function scores of WOMAC and SF-36 showed greater res ponsiveness than FAS at 3 months. These differences remained at 6 and 12 mo nths postoperatively. The differences between these 3 outcome measures were found to be similar using several methods for calculating responsiveness. Conclusion. Self-administered questionnaires like WOMAC and SF-36 are more responsive measures of pain and function than ran-e of motion, performance tests, and observer-administered questions (FAS) following total hip replac ement.