Parametrization schemes of incident radiation in the North Water Polynya

Citation
Jm. Hanesiak et al., Parametrization schemes of incident radiation in the North Water Polynya, ATMOS OCEAN, 39(3), 2001, pp. 223-238
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN
ISSN journal
07055900 → ACNP
Volume
39
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
223 - 238
Database
ISI
SICI code
0705-5900(200109)39:3<223:PSOIRI>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Surface incident radiation is a critical component of the Arctic surface en ergy balance making it important for sea-ice model parametrizations to prop erly account for these fluxes. In this article, we test the performance of various incident short-wave (K down arrow) and long-wave (L down arrow) flu x parametrizations using unique observations from the 1998 International No rth Water (NOW) Polynya Project between March and July. The dataset include s hourly observations over terrestrial, fast-ice and full marine polynya en vironments allowing for parametrization comparisons between each environmen t and determination of any seasonal biases. Performance testing is highly d ependent on observed input parameters that contain relative errors, however , significant differences between the marine and fast-ice fluxes are eviden t. Results are very similar between the terrestrial and fast-ice sites. The best K down arrow clear-sky schemes underestimate fluxes in the colder sea son and overestimate them in the warm season, with greater biases in the ma rine setting. The K down arrow cloudy-sky results suggest a similar cold an d warm season bias but with greater magnitudes, especially in the marine en vironment. The K down arrow cloudy-sky schemes require seasonal improvement s, especially in the marine atmosphere. The L down arrow clear-sky fluxes w ere generally overestimated during the colder season. Accounting for a less emissive atmosphere resulted in better flux approximations in all environm ents. L down arrow cloudy-sky fluxes were generally underestimated. Adjusti ng the cloudy-sky emissivity improved the estimated fluxes, however, result s were very different in the marine setting. The L down arrow cloudy-sky pa rametrizations may require re-evaluation due to a consistent negative bias as the observed flux increases.