Surface incident radiation is a critical component of the Arctic surface en
ergy balance making it important for sea-ice model parametrizations to prop
erly account for these fluxes. In this article, we test the performance of
various incident short-wave (K down arrow) and long-wave (L down arrow) flu
x parametrizations using unique observations from the 1998 International No
rth Water (NOW) Polynya Project between March and July. The dataset include
s hourly observations over terrestrial, fast-ice and full marine polynya en
vironments allowing for parametrization comparisons between each environmen
t and determination of any seasonal biases. Performance testing is highly d
ependent on observed input parameters that contain relative errors, however
, significant differences between the marine and fast-ice fluxes are eviden
t. Results are very similar between the terrestrial and fast-ice sites. The
best K down arrow clear-sky schemes underestimate fluxes in the colder sea
son and overestimate them in the warm season, with greater biases in the ma
rine setting. The K down arrow cloudy-sky results suggest a similar cold an
d warm season bias but with greater magnitudes, especially in the marine en
vironment. The K down arrow cloudy-sky schemes require seasonal improvement
s, especially in the marine atmosphere. The L down arrow clear-sky fluxes w
ere generally overestimated during the colder season. Accounting for a less
emissive atmosphere resulted in better flux approximations in all environm
ents. L down arrow cloudy-sky fluxes were generally underestimated. Adjusti
ng the cloudy-sky emissivity improved the estimated fluxes, however, result
s were very different in the marine setting. The L down arrow cloudy-sky pa
rametrizations may require re-evaluation due to a consistent negative bias
as the observed flux increases.