G. Pezzella et al., Treatment of depression in patients with breast cancer: a comparison between paroxetine and amitriptyline, BREAST CANC, 70(1), 2001, pp. 1-10
In the context of chronic physical illness, such as breast cancer, depressi
on is associated with increased morbidity, longer periods of hospitalizatio
n, and greater overall disability. Prompt diagnosis and effective treatment
is, therefore, essential. Several small studies have established the effic
acy of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) in this setting, and the selective
serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) would appear to be an alternative the
rapeutic option because of their established efficacy and better tolerabili
ty profile. This was a multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study in w
hich 179 women with breast cancer were randomized to treatment with either
the SSRI paroxetine (20-40 mg/day), or the TCA, amitriptyline (75-150 mg/da
y). After 8-weeks treatment, depressive symptomatology had improved markedl
y and to a similar extent in both groups on the Montgomery Asberg Depressio
n Rating Scale. Clinical global impression (CGI) Global improvement and Pat
ient global evaluation scales indicated that patients were minimally to muc
h improved at study endpoint; a change from moderately/mildly ill to border
line ill on the CGI severity of Illness scale. A steady improvement in qual
ity of life was also observed in both groups. There were no clinically sign
ificant differences between the groups. In total, 47 (53.4%) patients in th
e paroxetine group and 53 (59.6%) patients in the amitriptyline group had a
dverse experiences, the most common of which were the well-recognized side-
effects of the antidepressant medications or chemotherapy. Anticholinergic
effects were almost twice as frequent in the amitriptyline group (19.1%) co
mpared with paroxetine (11.4%). This study has demonstrated that paroxetine
is a suitable alternative to amitriptyline for the treatment of depression
in patients with breast cancer.