The aim of this study was to identify possible failure-specific prognostic
factors in non-small-cell lung cancer. Clinical outcome was analysed in 549
patients participating in the randomized controlled trial of CHART vs conv
entional radiotherapy. Local failure and distant failure with or without co
ncurrent local relapse were subjected to a competing risk analysis using an
accelerated failure-time model with a log-logistic hazard function. Random
ization to CHART (2P = 0.005), increasing age (2P = 0.036) and female sex (
2P = 0.09) was all associated with a prolonged interval to failure. Advance
d clinical stage was associated with a decreased interval to failure (2P =
0.004) and a significantly increased risk (2P = 0.009) of failing in distan
t rather than in local position. From this model, prognostic indices for lo
cal and distant failure were estimated for each individual patient. Competi
ng risk analysis allows identification of patients with different failure p
atterns, and may provide a means of stratifying patients for intensified lo
cal or systemic therapy. (C) 2001 Cancer Research Campaign.