Removal of caries using only hand instruments: A comparison of mechanical and chemo-mechanical methods

Citation
P. Nadonovsky et al., Removal of caries using only hand instruments: A comparison of mechanical and chemo-mechanical methods, CARIES RES, 35(5), 2001, pp. 384-389
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
da verificare
Journal title
CARIES RESEARCH
ISSN journal
00086568 → ACNP
Volume
35
Issue
5
Year of publication
2001
Pages
384 - 389
Database
ISI
SICI code
0008-6568(200109/10)35:5<384:ROCUOH>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, comfort and efficiency of removing dentin caries using only hand instruments. The CariSolv(TM) sys tem for caries removal consisting of a solvent gel and a set of specially d esigned hand instruments (chemo-mechanical) was compared to the use of conv entional spoon excavators (mechanical). This was a clinical randomised cont rolled trial where the two techniques were compared in the same individual. The outcome variables were: complete caries removal; pain during caries re moval; anaesthesia requested by the patient during caries removal; time tak en to remove caries. Sixty-six individuals, each with a pair of similar cav ities in permanent teeth were selected. After caries removal, a 'blinded' e valuator assessed the clinical status of the cavity, with the use of a prob e. The times for caries removal of the chemo-mechanical and mechanical meth ods were respectively: 9.2 +/-3.8 and 8.6 +/-3.8 min (p>0.05). There were 4 cavities arguably presenting signs of caries after cavity preparation in t he 66 cavities treated with the mechanical method and 7 in the 66 chemo-mec hanical cavities (p>0,05). Some pain/discomfort was reported by 21 (32%) pa rticipants when the chemo-mechanical method was used, compared with 43 (65% ) when the mechanical method was used (p<0.05). During the chemo-mechanical and the mechanical treatment, 2 (3%) and 5 (8%) patients, respectively, re quested local anaesthesia (p>0.05). The chemo-mechanical method appeared to be more comfortable for most patients. Copyright (C) 2001 S. Karger AG, Ba sel.