Identification of patients with coronary artery disease by assessing diastolic abnormalities during isometric exercise

Citation
J. Manolas et al., Identification of patients with coronary artery disease by assessing diastolic abnormalities during isometric exercise, CLIN CARD, 24(11), 2001, pp. 735-743
Citations number
45
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY
ISSN journal
01609289 → ACNP
Volume
24
Issue
11
Year of publication
2001
Pages
735 - 743
Database
ISI
SICI code
0160-9289(200111)24:11<735:IOPWCA>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Background: Previous clinical studies using invasive and noninvasive method s have shown handgrip-induced diastolic abnormalities in patients with coro nary artery disease (CAD). Hypothesis: The study was undertaken to determine the utility of Doppler ec ho- and pressocardiography during handgrip in discriminating patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and in those with normal coronary arteries. Methods: Both methods were obtained in 96 patients with suspected CAD withi n 24 h before coronary angiography. An abnormal handgrip-Doppler was define d by an early (E) to late (A) transmittal flow velocities ratio (E/A) < 1 d uring handgrip and a positive handgrip pressocardiographic test (HAT) by an abnormal increase in the A wave/total excursion or prolongation of the abs olute or relative (heart-rate corrected) total relaxation time during isome tric exercise. Results: Of the 96 patients studied, 23 had normal coronary arteries and 73 showed CAD. In patients with normal coronary arteries, handgrip-Doppler sh owed an abnormal average E/A at rest and during handgrip, whereas all varia bles of HAT were within normal limits. In patients with CAD, handgrip-Doppl er showed only a moderate handgrip-induced increase in average A (+19%, p < 0.001), whereas HAT showed a significant (p < 0.001) increase in mean A wa ve/total excursion (+ 60%) and decrease in the relative total relaxation ti me (- 17%). Furthermore, handgrip-Doppler and HAT were abnormal in 15 of 23 (65% specificity 35%) and the HAT in 5 of 23 (22%, specificity 78%) patien ts with normal coronary arteries, as well as in 57 of 73 (sensitivity 78%) and 69 of 73 (95%) patients with CAD. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that these noninvasive stress tests can become a useful new diagnostic modality for detecting patients with unknow n or suspected CAD.