Favorable outcome of renal transplantation in patients with IgA nephropathy

Citation
Mb. Andresdottir et al., Favorable outcome of renal transplantation in patients with IgA nephropathy, CLIN NEPHR, 56(4), 2001, pp. 279-288
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology","da verificare
Journal title
CLINICAL NEPHROLOGY
ISSN journal
03010430 → ACNP
Volume
56
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
279 - 288
Database
ISI
SICI code
0301-0430(200110)56:4<279:FOORTI>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Background: The outcome of renal transplantation in patients with IgA nephr opathy (IgAN) may be affected by recurrence of the original disease. Despit e this risk of recurrent glomerulonephritis, graft survival in patients wit h IgAN is considered good although formal comparisons with graft survival i n patients with other renal diseases have given conflicting results. Method s: We have studied both recurrence rate and outcome after renal transplanta tion in 79 adult patients with IgAN, all of whom received a first renal gra ft (55 cadaveric, 24 living-related donor) in our center in the period betw een 1969 and 1997. Graft survival in patients with IgAN was compared with t he outcome in patients with pyelonephritis and adult polycystic kidney dise ase (group 2) and patients with non-IgA primary glomerulonephritis (group 3 ). Results: Follow-up averaged 5.6 +/- 4.5 years. Histological evidence of mesangial IgA deposits was present in 17 of 32 available biopsies (53%). Cl inically recurrent IgAN was diagnosed only in 7 patients (9% of all recipie nts), with a higher incidence in recipients of a living-related donor graft (5/24 (20%) vs 2/55 (4%)). These recurrences were diagnosed in biopsies ta ken 13 - 145 months after transplantation; and all were characterized by si gnificant proteinuria (> 1 g/day). In only one patient the graft was lost d ue to the recurrence. For recipients of a cadaveric, graft, the 5-year graf t survival was significantly better in IgAN patients than in both reference groups (86% vs 67% in group 2; p = 0.012, and 60% in group 3; p = 0.007). This difference remained significant after censoring for death. There was n o statistically significant difference in the patient survival between the groups. The rejection rate in the first 3 months was numerically lower in t he IgAN patients (37% vs 43% and 49%, respectively), and total immunologica l failure rate was also lower in the IgAN patients compared to the control groups (13% vs 21% and 23%, respectively); although the differences were no t statistically significant. The 5- and 10-year graft survival in recipient s of living-related donor grafts was significantly better in IgAN patients than in group 3 (96% and 84% vs 64% and 21%, respectively; p = 0.02), but s imilar to graft survival in group 2 (87% and 75%). Conclusion: A clinical r ecurrence of IgAN occurred in 4% of patients with a cadaveric donor graft a nd 20% of patients with a living-related donor graft. The recurrence had ne gligible influence on 5- and 10-year graft survival. Graft survival after c adaveric transplantation was better in the IgAN patients compared to contro l groups; possibly due to the lower immunological failure rate in IgAN.