Comparison of anti-PR3 capture and anti-PR3 direct ELISA for detection of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) in long-term clinical follow-up of PR3-ANCA-associated vasculitis patients

Citation
O. Arranz et al., Comparison of anti-PR3 capture and anti-PR3 direct ELISA for detection of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) in long-term clinical follow-up of PR3-ANCA-associated vasculitis patients, CLIN NEPHR, 56(4), 2001, pp. 295-301
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology","da verificare
Journal title
CLINICAL NEPHROLOGY
ISSN journal
03010430 → ACNP
Volume
56
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
295 - 301
Database
ISI
SICI code
0301-0430(200110)56:4<295:COACAA>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
A total of 118 sera from 11 patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antib odies against proteinase-3- (PR3-ANCA) associated vasculitis were retrospec tively screened by anti-PR3 capture and anti-PR3 direct ELISA tests. We stu died the relationship between capture and direct ELISA scores and the clini cal activity of PR3-ANCA-associated vasculitis patients during follow-up. W e also studied the ability of the anti-PR3 capture ELISA to detect positive values of PR3-ANCA in clinical vasculitis relapses. Only capture ELISA pre sented a significant relationship (p < 0.05) with clinical activity of PR3- ANCA-associated vasculitis patients over time. Capture ELISA appears to be a reliable method for detecting clinical relapses in this group of patients . Our results indicate that the new capture ELISA test is more effective th an direct ELISA in the follow-up of patients with PR3-ANCA-associated vascu litis and in the detection of relapses.