This article examines how research productivity, administrative service, an
d teaching affect reputational capital in the market for academic economist
s. Also, we investigate the issue of the durability of reputational capital
, estimating the penalties associated with gaps in research output. Our res
ults reveal that (1) the market makes a distinction between the quantity an
d the quality of an individual's research output, (2) a smaller number of f
requently cited papers enhances reputational capital more than a greater nu
mber of less frequently cited papers, (3) reputational capital does not dep
reciate rapidly during research breaks, and (4) the market does not discoun
t co-authored papers.