Accountability is a complex idea frequently invoked as political rhetoric.
Accordingly, a theoretical framework that includes bureaucratic, performanc
e, market, and professional models of accountability is necessary to analyz
e the accountability system created for Arizona charter schools. Using a qu
alitative case study that relied on observations, interviews, and document
analysis, this case indicated that valid and reliable performance data are
not an intrinsic element of a school choice program. Accordingly, mechanism
s that capture and distribute accurate, accessible, and wide-ranging inform
ation about schools of choice will assist consumers in making informed deci
sions when selecting among schools.