Health-related quality of life and cost-effectiveness studies in the European randomised study of screening for prostate cancer and the US Prostate, Lung, Colon and Ovary trial
Ab. Miller et al., Health-related quality of life and cost-effectiveness studies in the European randomised study of screening for prostate cancer and the US Prostate, Lung, Colon and Ovary trial, EUR J CANC, 37(17), 2001, pp. 2154-2160
Decisions on policies for screening for prostate cancer require that inform
ation upon health-related quality of lire (HRQL) and cost-effectiveness (CE
) be available, as the lead time for some of the cases detected by screenin
g will be very long and detriments in quality of life could have a major im
pact on the subjects remaining life-span. A framework within which both HRQ
L and cost-effectiveness of prostate cancer screening can be assessed is pr
esented. Studies or both are ongoing in the European Randomised Study of sc
reening for prostate cancer and the US Prostate, Lung, Colon and Ovary tria
l. Preliminary information confirms that it is important to study screened
subjects and controls, and not to assume that inferences derived from Study
of prostate cancer outside screening trials can be extrapolated to the tri
als. However, it will require prolonged study to enable tile overall effect
s on quality of life, and on cost-effectiveness to be determined. Such stud
ies are ongoing for the two trials. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All righ
ts reserved.