It is well-known that effective prediction of project cost related factors
is an important aspect of software engineering. Unfortunately, despite exte
nsive research over more than 30 years, this remains a significant problem
for many practitioners. A major obstacle is the absence of reliable and sys
tematic historic data, yet this is a sine qua non for almost all proposed m
ethods: statistical, machine learning or calibration of existing models. In
this paper, we describe our sparse data method (SDM) based upon a pairwise
comparison technique and Saaty's Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Our min
imum data requirement is a single known point. The technique is supported b
y a software tool known as DataSalvage. We show, for data from two companie
s, how our approach-based upon expert judgement-adds value to expert judgem
ent by producing significantly more accurate and less biased results. A sen
sitivity analysis shows that our approach is robust to pairwise comparison
errors. We then describe the results of a small usability trial with a prac
ticing project manager. From this empirical work, we conclude that the tech
nique is promising and may help overcome some of the present barriers to ef
fective project prediction.