Purpose: To better define the efficacy and safety of argon plasma coagulati
on (APC), specifically for brachytherapy-related proctitis, we reviewed the
clinical course of 7 patients treated for persistent rectal bleeding. Appr
oximately 2-10% of prostate cancer patients treated with I-125 or Pd-103 br
achytherapy will develop radiation proctitis. The optimum treatment for pat
ients with persistent bleeding is unclear from the paucity of available dat
a. Prior reports lack specific dosimetric information, and patients with wi
dely divergent forms of radiation were grouped together in the analyses.
Methods and Materials: Seven patients were treated with APC at the Veterans
Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System and the University of Washington fr
om 1997 to 1999 for persistent rectal bleeding due to prostate brachytherap
y-related proctitis. Four patients received supplemental external beam radi
ation, delivered by a four-field technique. A single gastroenterologist at
the Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System treated 6 of the 7 pati
ents. If the degree of proctitis was limited, all sites of active bleeding
were coagulated in symptomatic patients. An argon plasma coagulator electro
surgical system was used to administer treatments every 4-8 weeks as needed
. The argon gas flow was set at 1.6 L/min, with an electrical power setting
of 40-45 W.
Results: The rectal V100 (the total rectal volume, including the lumen, rec
eiving the prescription dose or greater) for the 7 patients ranged from 0.1
3 to 4.61 cc. Rectal bleeding was first noticed 3-18 months after implantat
ion. APC (range 1-3 sessions) was performed 9-22 months after implantation,
Five patients had complete resolution of their bleeding, usually within da
ys of completing APC. Two patients had only partial relief from bleeding, b
ut declined additional APC therapy. No patient developed clinically evident
progressive rectal wall abnormalities after APC, (post-APC follow-up range
4-13 months).
Conclusions: Most patients benefited from APC, and no cases of clinically e
vident progressive tissue destruction were noted. Although APC appears to b
e efficacious and safe in the setting of the rectal doses described here, c
aution is in order when contemplating APC for brachytherapy patients. (C) 2
001 Elsevier Science Inc.