Comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine with gadopentetate dimeglumine for magnetic resonance imaging of liver tumors

Citation
R. Kuwatsuru et al., Comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine with gadopentetate dimeglumine for magnetic resonance imaging of liver tumors, INV RADIOL, 36(11), 2001, pp. 632-641
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00209996 → ACNP
Volume
36
Issue
11
Year of publication
2001
Pages
632 - 641
Database
ISI
SICI code
0020-9996(200111)36:11<632:COGDWG>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. To compare gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) with gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) for magnetic resonance imaging of the liver. METHODS. The contrast agent Gd-BOPTA or Gd-DTPA was administered at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg to 257 patients suspected of having malignant liver tumors. Dynamic phase images, spin-echo images obtained within 10 minutes of inject ion, and delayed images obtained 40 to 120 minutes after injection were acq uired. All postcontrast images were compared with unenhanced TI-weighted an d T2-weighted images obtained immediately before injection. A full safety a ssessment was performed. RESULTS. The contrast efficacy for dynamic phase imaging was moderately or markedly improved in 90.9% (110/121) and 87.9% (109/124) of patients for Gd -BOPTA and Gd-DTPA, respectively. At 40 to 120 minutes after injection, the corresponding improvements were 21.7% (26/120) and 11.6% (14/121) for spin -echo sequences and 44.5% (53/119) and 19.0% (23/121) for breath-hold gradi ent-echo sequences, respectively. The differences at 40 to 120 minutes afte r injection were statistically significant (P < 0.02). Increased informatio n at 40 to 120 minutes after injection compared with information acquired w ithin 10 minutes of injection was available for 24.0% (29/121) of patients with Gd-BOPTA and for 14.5% (18/124) of patients with Gd-DTPA (P < 0.03). A dverse events were seen in 4.7% (6/128) and 1.6% (2/127) of patients receiv ing Gd-BOPTA and Gd-DTPA, respectively. The difference was not statisticall y significant. CONCLUSIONS. The efficacy of Gd-BOPTA is equivalent to that of Gd-DTPA for liver imaging during the dynamic phase and superior during the delayed (40- 120 minutes) phase of contrast enhancement. Both agents are safe for use in magnetic resonance imaging of the liver.