Il. De La Serna et al., MyoD can induce cell cycle arrest but not muscle differentiation in the presence of dominant negative SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling enzymes, J BIOL CHEM, 276(44), 2001, pp. 41486-41491
Cell cycle arrest is critical for muscle differentiation, and the two proce
sses are closely coordinated but temporally separable. SWI/SNF complexes ar
e ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling enzymes that have been shown to be req
uired for muscle differentiation in cell culture and have also been reporte
d to be required for Rb-mediated cell cycle arrest. We therefore looked mor
e closely at how SWI/SNF enzymes affect the events that occur during MyoD-i
nduced myogenesis, namely, cell cycle regulation and muscle-specific gene e
xpression, in cells that inducibly express dominant negative versions of Br
ahma (BRM) and Brahma-related gene 1 (BRG1), the ATPase subunits of two dis
tinct SWI/SNF complexes. Although dominant negative BRM and BRG1 inhibited
expression of every muscle-specific regulator and structural gene assayed,
there was no effect on MyoD-induced activation of cell cycle regulatory pro
teins, and thus, cells arrested normally. In particular, in the presence or
absence of dominant negative BRM or BRG1, MyoD was able to activate expres
sion of p21, cyclin D3, and Rb, all of which are critical for cell cycle wi
thdrawal in the G(1)/G(0) phase of the cell cycle. These findings suggest t
hat at least one basis for the distinct mechanisms that regulate cessation
of cell proliferation and muscle-specific gene expression during muscle dif
ferentiation is that SWI/SNF-mediated chromatin-remodeling enzymes are requ
ired only for the latter.