Empirical studies in business ethics often rely on self-reported data, but
this reliance is open to criticism. Responses to questionnaires and intervi
ews may be influenced by the subject's view of what the researcher might wa
nt to hear, by a reluctance to talk about sensitive ethical issues, and by
imperfect recall. This paper reviews the extent to which published research
in business ethics relies on interviews and questionnaires, and then explo
res the possibilities of using secondary data, such as company documents an
d newspaper reports, as a source for empirical studies in applied ethics. A
specific example is then discussed, describing the source material, the me
thod, the development of the research questions, and the way in which relia
bility and validity were established. In the example, content analysis was
used to examine the extent to which the executive virtue of courage was obs
erved or called for in items published in four international daily newspape
rs, and to explore the meaning which was attributed to "courage" in the pap
ers.