A. Unver et al., Western blot analysis of sera reactive to human monocytic ehrlichiosis andhuman granulocytic ehrlichiosis agents, J CLIN MICR, 39(11), 2001, pp. 3982-3986
Laboratory diagnosis of human ehrlichioses is routinely made by an indirect
immunofluorescence assay (IFA) using cultured ehrlichia-infected whole cel
ls as antigen. Concern has been raised that incorrect diagnoses of human mo
nocytic ehrlichiosis (HME) or human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) may be
made on the basis of serologic cross-reactivity between Ehrlichia chaffeens
is and the agent of HGE. The present study examined whether two recombinant
major outer membrane proteins, rP30 and rP44, that were previously shown t
o be sensitive and specific serodiagnostic antigens for HME and HGE, respec
tively, could be used to discriminate IFA dually reacting sera. Thirteen du
ally IFA-reactive sera, three sera that were IFA positive only with E. chaf
feensis, and three sera that were IFA positive only with the HGE agent were
examined by Western immunoblot analysis using purified whole organisms and
recombinant proteins as antigens. All 16 E. chaffeensis IFA-positive sera
reacted with rP30. However, none of these sera reacted with rP44, regardles
s of IFA reactivity with the HGE agent. The three HGE-agent-only IFA-positi
ve sera reacted only with rP44, not with rP30. Western immunoblotting using
purified E. chaffeensis and the HGE agent as antigens suggested that heat
shock and other proteins, but not major outer membrane proteins, cross-reac
t between the two organisms. Therefore, Western immunoblot analysis using r
P44 and rP30 may be useful in discriminating dually HME and HGE IFA-reactiv
e sera.