Events that are incongruent with their prevailing context are usually very
well remembered. This fact often is described as the distinctiveness effect
in memory, an effect that has served as explanation not only of memory phe
nomena but also of various other phenomena, including social judgment. The
core laboratory paradigm for studying distinctiveness in memory research ha
s long been the isolation paradigm. This paradigm, sometimes attributed to
H. von Restorff (1933), yields better memory for an item categorically isol
ated from surrounding items than for the surrounding items and a prop er co
ntrol item, The authors offer an interpretation of the isolation effect bas
ed on the analysis of the processing of similarities and differences among
the items. Two experiments provide evidence for this interpretation. The re
sults are discussed in the context of current theories of distinctiveness e
ffects in memory. An appeal is made for a different conceptualization of di
stinctiveness effects, one that treats distinctiveness as a discriminative
process in memory that requires processing of both similarities and differe
nces among items.