When attorney effort is unobservable and certain other simplifying assumpti
ons (such as risk neutrality) hold, it is efficient for an attorney to purc
hase the rights to a client's legal claim. However, the American Bar Associ
ation Model Rules of Professional Conduct prohibit this arrangement. We sho
w that this ethical restriction, which is formally equivalent to requiring
a minimum fixed fee of zero, can create economic rents for attorneys, even
though they continue to compete along the contingent-fee dimension. The con
tingent fee is not bid down to the zero-profit level, because such a fee do
es not induce sufficient attorney effort. We thereby provide a political ec
onomy explanation for these restrictions.