C. Sainte-rose et al., Management of hydrocephalus in pediatric patients with posterior fossa tumors: the role of endoscopic third ventriculostomy, J NEUROSURG, 95(5), 2001, pp. 791-797
Object. The authors undertook a study to evaluate the effectiveness of endo
scopic third ventriculostomy in the management of hydrocephalus before and
after surgical intervention for posterior fossa tumors in children.
Methods. Between October 1, 1993, and December 31, 1997, a total of 206 con
secutive children with posterior fossa tumors underwent surgery at Hopital
Necker-Enfants Malades in Paris. Excluded were 10 patients in whom shunts h
ad been placed at the referring hospital. The medical records and neuroimag
ing studies of the remaining 196 patients were reviewed and categorized int
o three groups: Group A, 67 patients with hydrocephalus present on admissio
n in whom endoscopic third ventriculostomy was performed prior to tumor rem
oval; Group B, 82 patients with hydrocephalus who did not undergo prelimina
ry third ventriculostomy but instead received conventional treatment; and G
roup C, 47 patients in whom no ventricular dilation was present on admissio
n.
There were no significant differences between patients in Group A or B with
respect to the following variables: age at presentation, evidence of metas
tatic disease, extent of tumor resection, or follow-up duration. In patient
s in Group A, however, more severe hydrocephalus was demonstrated (p < 0.01
); the patients in Group C were in this respect different from those in the
other two groups.
Ultimately, there were only four patients (6%) in Group A compared with 22
patients (26.8%) in Group B (p 0.001) in whom progressive hydrocephalus req
uired treatment following removal of the posterior fossa tumor. Sixteen pat
ients (20%) in Group B underwent insertion of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt,
which is similar to the incidence reported in the literature and significa
ntly different from that demonstrated in Group A (p < 0.016). The other six
patients (7.3%) were treated by endoscopic third ventriculostomy after tum
or resection. In Group C, two patients (4.3%) with postoperative hydrocepha
lus underwent endoscopic third ventriculostomy.
In three patients who required placement of CSF shunts several episodes of
shunt malfunction occurred that were ultimately managed by endoscopic third
ventriculostomy and definitive removal of the shunt. There were no deaths;
however, there were four cases of transient morbidity associated with thir
d ventriculostomy.
Conclusions. Third ventriculostomy is feasible even in the presence of post
erior fossa tumors (including brainstem tumors). When performed prior to po
sterior fossa surgery, it significantly reduces the incidence of postoperat
ive hydrocephalus. The procedure provides a valid alternative to placement
of a permanent shunt in cases in which hydrocephalus develops following pos
terior fossa surgery, and it may negate the need for the shunt in cases in
which the shunt malfunctions. Furthermore, in patients in whom CSF has caus
ed spread of the tumor at presentation, third ventriculostomy allows chemot
herapy to be undertaken prior to tumor excision by controlling hydrocephalu
s.
Although the authors acknowledge that the routine application of third vent
riculostomy in selected patients results in a proportion of patients underg
oing an "unnecessary" procedure, they believe that because patients' postop
erative courses are less complicated and because the incidence of morbidity
is low and the success rate is high in those patients with severe hydrocep
halus that further investigation of this protocol is warranted.