G. Iaconetta et al., Duplicated abducent nerve and its course: microanatomical study and surgery-related considerations, J NEUROSURG, 95(5), 2001, pp. 853-858
Object. The anatomy of the abducent nerve is well known; its duplication (r
anging from 5 to 28.6%), however, has rarely been reported in the literatur
e. The authors performed a microanatomical study in 100 cadaveric specimens
(50 heads) to evaluate the prevalence of this phenomenon and to provide a
clear anatomical description of the course and relationships of the nerve.
The surgery-related implications of this rare anatomical variant will be hi
ghlighted.
Methods. The 50 human cadaveric heads (100 specimens) were embalmed in a 10
% formalin solution for 3 weeks. Fifteen of them were injected with colored
neoprene latex. A duplicated abducent nerve was found in eight specimens (
8%). In two (25%) of these eight specimens the nerve originated at the pont
omedullary sulcus as two independent trunks: in one case the superior trunk
was thicker than the inferior and in the other it was thinner. In the othe
r six cases (75%) the nerve originated as a single trunk, splitting in two
trunks into the cisternal segment: in two of them the trunks ran below the
Gruber ligament, whereas in four specimens one trunk ran below and one abov
e it. In all the specimens, the duplicated nerves fused again into the cave
rnous sinus, just after the posterior genu of the internal carotid artery.
Conclusions. Although the presence of a duplicated abducent nerve is a rare
finding, preoperative magnetic resonance imaging should be performed to ru
le out this possibility, thus tailoring the operation to avoid postoperativ
e deficits.