Preinduction cervical ripening - A randomized trial of intravaginal misoprostol alone vs. a combination of transcervical Foley balloon and intravaginal misoprostol
Oa. Rust et al., Preinduction cervical ripening - A randomized trial of intravaginal misoprostol alone vs. a combination of transcervical Foley balloon and intravaginal misoprostol, J REPRO MED, 46(10), 2001, pp. 899-904
OBJECTIVE: To determine if the addition of a mechanical ripening agent (tra
nscervical Foley balloon) to a pharmacologic agent (intravaginal misoprosto
l) improves the efficiency of preinduction cervical ripening.
STUDY DESIGN: Singleton patients with an indication for delivery, unfavorab
le cervix (Bishop score less than or equal to5) and no contraindication to
labor were randomly assigned to two groups: misoprostol alone (25 mug intra
vaginally every 3 hours for no more than 12 hr) or combination therapy (25-
French transcervical Foley balloon inflated to 50 mL of sterile water with
identical intravaginal misoprostol dosing). All patients received a history
and physical examination (including Bishop score), preripening ultrasound,
electronic fetal heart rate and contraction monitoring (to rule out sponta
neous labor and document fetal well-being). Multiple variables of perinatal
outcome were analyzed, including the main outcome variables of ripening-to
-delivery time and cesarean section rate.
RESULTS: During, August 1998 to August 1999, 81 patients were randomized, 4
0 to misoprostol alone and 41 to combination therapy. There were no differe
nces between the groups with respect to maternal demographics, preripening
Bishop score, maternal complications, intrapartum intervention or neonatal
outcome. The misoprostol group spent longer periods of time in active labor
, and there was a trend for the combination group to require oxytocin for l
onger intervals. These findings did not significantly affect the total ripe
ning-to-delivery time or cesarean section, rate which were similar for both
groups.
CONCLUSION. The addition of mechanical ripening with a transcervical Foley
balloon to intravaginal misoprostol did not improve the efficiency of prein
duction cervical ripening. Mechanical and pharmacologic cervical ripening a
gents appear to act independently rather than synergistically.