The clinical course of new-onset atrial fibrillation after elective aorticoperations

Citation
Rj. Valentine et al., The clinical course of new-onset atrial fibrillation after elective aorticoperations, J AM COLL S, 193(5), 2001, pp. 499-504
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS
ISSN journal
10727515 → ACNP
Volume
193
Issue
5
Year of publication
2001
Pages
499 - 504
Database
ISI
SICI code
1072-7515(200111)193:5<499:TCCONA>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The onset of atrial fibrillation (AFIB) in the postoperative se tting has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patient s undergoing major noncardiothoracic operations. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence, associated complications, and outcomes of A FIB after open aortic operations. STUDY DESIGN: We studied 211 consecutive patients undergoing elective aorti c operations at a single hospital during a recent 6-year period. Postoperat ively all patients had continuous ECG monitoring in the ICU for a mean (+/- SD) of 6 +/- 8 days and routine cardiac enzyme determinations. RESULTS: AFIB developed in 22 of the 211 patients (10%), a mean (+/- SD) of 2 +/- 1 days after operation, and it lasted for a mean of 4 +/- 6 days aft er onset. Sixteen patients spontaneously reverted to normal sinus rhythm, 3 required cardioversion (2 chemical, 1 electrical), and 3 continued in AFIB at discharge. Four of the 22 patients suffered additional cardiac complica tions, including antecedent MI in 3 (14%) and sustained cardiogenic shock r equiring electrical cardioversion in 1. By comparison, the incidence of MI in the other 189 patients was 4% (no significant difference [NSD]). There w ere no deaths in the AFIB patients. Cardiac emboli developed in none of the 22 patients, and all patients had normal sinus rhythm on ECG obtained a me an of 14 +/- 10 months after discharge. Comparing the 22 patients with AFIB with the 189 patients without AFIB, there were no differences in the mean duration of ICU stay (6 4 versus 6 8 days), total length of hospital stay ( 10 +/- 5 versus 11 +/- 10 days), or hospital mortality (0% versus 0.5%). AF IB patients were older (71 versus 66 years, p = 0.016), but there was no di fference in gender or use of beta -blockers between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that AFIB is not uncommon after aortic oper ations but is not associated with increased morbidity, mortality, or length of hospital stay. Although a minority of affected patients can have other cardiac complications such as MI, these complications are usually recognize d before the onset of AFIB. AFIB does not affect the outcomes of aortic ope rations. Most patients will revert spontaneously to normal sinus rhythm and do not require longterm anticoagulation to prevent thromboembolic complica tions. (J Am Coll Surg 2001;193: 499-504. (C) 2001 by the American College of Surgeons).