The productivity slowdown of the early 1970s continues to puzzle econo
mists. A frequent explanation of this puzzle is that mismeasurement of
output has worsened enough to help account for the apparent shortfall
of output growth. Griliches (1994) highlighted one channel through wh
ich this worsening measurement could occur. He raised the possibility
that-because output growth in the service sector likely is undermeasur
ed-the rising share of services has led to greater undermeasurement of
overall economic growth. This paper demonstrates that this argument i
s of little quantitative significance. Even under assumptions most fav
orable to the hypothesis, the rising share of services has had only a
small impact on measurement error. These results-along with evidence f
rom Baily and Gordon (1988)-make mismeasurement of output an improbabl
e explanation for the productivity slowdown in aggregate data.