C. Grillon et M. Davis, FEAR-POTENTIATED STARTLE CONDITIONING IN HUMANS - EXPLICIT AND CONTEXTUAL CUE CONDITIONING FOLLOWING PAIRED VERSUS UNPAIRED TRAINING, Psychophysiology, 34(4), 1997, pp. 451-458
Conditioned fear in response to explicit and contextual cues was exami
ned using the startle reflex in three groups of participants over two
sessions separated by 4-5 days. The conditioned stimulus (CS) was pair
ed with an aversive unconditioned stimulus (US) (shock) during conditi
oning in the paired but not in the unpaired group. In the reaction tim
e (RT) group, the US was a nonaversive visual signal for an RT task. I
n the paired group, the CS potentiated startle in the postconditioning
phase. This conditioned response was fully retained over the retentio
n interval. There was no substantial change in baseline startle (start
le delivered in the absence of CS). By contrast, startle was not poten
tiated by the CS in the unpaired group, but baseline startle was incre
ased from Session 1 to Session 2. In the RT group, startle was not aff
ected by the CS, and baseline startle was reduced from Session 1 to Se
ssion 2. These results suggest that paired presentations of a CS and a
n aversive US result in conditioned fear in response to the CS but lit
tle contextual fear, whereas unpaired presentations of a CS and US lea
ds to poor explicit cue conditioning but substantial contextual fear.