The aim of the study is to determine the effects of wound, patient and trea
tment attributes on the wound healing rate and to propose a system for woun
d healing rate prediction. Predicting the wound healing rate from the initi
al wound, patient and treatment data collected in a database of 300 chronic
wounds is not possible. After considering weekly follow-ups, it was determ
ined that the best prognostic factors are weekly follow-ups of the wound he
aling process, which alone were found to predict accurately the wound heali
ng rate after a minimum follow-up period of four weeks (at least five measu
rements of wound area). After combining the follow-ups with wound, patient
and treatment attributes, the minimum follow-up period was reduced to two w
eeks (at least three measurements of wound area). After a follow-up period
of two weeks, it was possible to predict the wound healing rate of an indep
endent test set of chronic wounds with a relative squared error of 0.347, a
nd after three weeks, with a relative squared error of 0.181 (using regress
ion trees with linear equations in its leaves). Regression trees with a rel
ative squared error close to 0 produce better prediction than with an error
closer to 1. Results show that the type of treatment is just one of many p
rognostic factors. Arranged in order of decreasing prediction capability, p
rognostic factors are: wound size, patient's age, elapsed time from wound a
ppearance to the beginning of the treatment, width-to-length ratio, locatio
n and type of treatment. The data collected support former findings that th
e biphasic- and direct-current stimulation contributes to faster healing of
chronic wounds, The model of wound healing dynamics aids the prediction of
chronic wound healing rate, and hence helps with the formulation of approp
riate treatment decisions.